Jurnal Standardisasi

Notifications

Editorial Board

Reviewer

Journal Help

Font Size



Home Search Mail RSS


EVALUATION ON THE CONSISTENCY OF CALIBRATION RESULTS BETWEEN REFERENCE STANDARDS OF PNEUMATIC PRESSURE BALANCE BASED ON NON-FULL RANGE CALIBRATION

Adindra Vickar Ega, R.Rudi Anggoro Samodro

Abstract


To provide calibration services for pressure measuring devices, SNSU-BSN has several piston-cylinder standard that may traceable to different National Metrology Institute (NMIs). Non-full range calibration of pressure balance has been performed to evaluate the consistency of calibration results between those standard, especially for establishing self-traceability in the future. In this research, a piston-cylinder unit S/N 1926 with medium pressure range of 1750 kPa, was calibrated with low pressure range S/N 978 of 350 kPa and high pressure range S/N 1054 of 7000 kPa. The calibration was performed with cross-float method to evaluate the effective area of piston-cylinder at null pressure and reference temperature of 20⁰C (A0,20) and distortion coefficient (λ) as the 1926 main parameters. The obtained value, respectively are (1.961 166 × 10-4 ± 4.4 × 10-9) m2 and (-1.67 × 10-12 ± 9.4 × 10-13) Pa-1 from 978 and (1.961166 × 10-4 ± 5.1 × 10-9) m2 and (-1.58 × 10-12 ± 8.4 × 10-13) Pa-1 from 1054. The result of 1926 from both methods shows good conformity with Normalized Error (En) of 0.0007 and 0.069, respectively. Linearity of effective area changes to the pressure is very consistent in both low and high pressure range. Validation results by using PTB-Germany results, shows the relative different for A0 and λ obtained are less than 0,1 × 10-6 and 6%,respectively. Therefore, the pneumatic pressure balance of SNSU-BSN is traceable, consistent with each other and capable for disseminating the pressure unit along all primary pressure standard owned with high agreement compared to those of other advance NMIs.


Keywords


consistency between standard, non-full range calibration, pneumatic, pressure balance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bair, M.(2011). A method for verifying traceability in effective area for high pressure oil piston-cylinder. 2011 NCSL International Workshop & Symposium.

Ega, A. V.& Samodro, R. R. A.(2017). Penentuan parameter hasil kalibrasi Dead Weight Tester (DWT) berdasarkan analisa curve fitting. PPI-KIM, 43, 126–138.

Ega, A. V.& Samodro, R. R. A.(2017).TAC method to overcome the practical difficulty in the calibration of DWT with insensitive piston.Presented on the 1st International Conference on Metrology (ICONMET) October 25-26 2017 in Jakarta, Indonesia.

Ega, A. V., & Samodro, R. R. A. (2017). Analysis of MSL TG-13 pressure gauge calibration method. Instrumentasi, 38(2), 33-42.

Ega, A. V., & Samodro, R. R. A. (2014). Pengecekan-antara pressure balance standar sebagai implementasi jaminan mutu laboratorium tekanan puslit metrologi lipi sesuai dengan sni iso/iec 17025: 2008. Prosiding PPI Standardisasi, 43-54.

EURAMET. (2011). Calibration of pressure balance.

Ginanjar, G., Ega, A. V.& Samodro, R. A.(2017).The characterization of automatic additional-mass handling for pressure balance interval checks.12th Annual Meeting on Testing and Quality, 28–31.

Morrison, F. A. (2014).Obtaining uncertainty measures on slope and intercept of a least squares fit with Excel’s LINEST.

Olson, D. A. (2009). NIST calibration services for pressure using piston gauge standards. NIST Special Publication, 250, 39.

Olson, D. A., Driver, R. G., & Bowers, W. J. (2010). A gas pressure scale based on primary standard piston gauges. Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 115(6), 393-412.

Owen, N. (2011). Linking Hydraulic and Pneumatic Pressure Sca-les Using a Common Piston Gauge. In " 5th CCM international conference on pressure and vacuum metrology" and the" 4th international conference IMEKO TC16 (Vol. 121, No. 3, p. 281).

PTB. (2017). Calibration certificate of pressure balance PG-7601 : PTB 30099/17. Germany.

Ramnath, V. (2011). Determination of pressure balance distortion coefficient and zero-pressure effective area uncertainties. International Journal of Metrology and Quality Engineering, 2(2), 101-119.

RCM-LIPI. (2018). I.MM.3.03 Procedure of the pneumatic pressure balance calibration. South Tangerang

Samodro, R. A. & Ega, A. V.(2016). Kalibrasi pressure balance pada sebagian rentang dan analisa efektivitasnya dalam membangun sumber ketertelusuran pada lingkup tekanan.PPI-KIM Ke-42,333–342.

Samodro, R. A. et all. (2012). Roadmap laboratorium tekanan (5 tahun), Slide Presentasi, Jakarta : Puslit Metrologi LIPI




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31153/js.v21i3.774

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.