ANALYSIS OF AIRY POINT APPLICATION ON LINE SCALE CALIBRATION IN RCM LIPI

Nadya Larasati Kartika, Nurul Alfiyati

Abstract

Calibration of line scale in the Research Center for Metrology LIPI Indonesia (RCM-LIPI) is traceable to one dimensional measuring machine (SIP machine). Capability of the SIP machine table used as the base of line scale, however, covers only up to 400 mm and can be extended to 1000 mm using shifting methods. Supporting point as a method to maintain line scale still straight during measurement should be applied on machine table. For line scale ranged 400 mm, supporting point can be attached because the whole artefact is on the table, while some of the industrial instruments have scales above 400 mm, this mean slightly difficult to attach supporting point. This paper described an appropriate supporting points setting and their influence in line scale calibration ranged 500 mm by designed two systems supporting point attachment, they are L = 500 mm and L = 350 mm. As for the supporting points, airy points were used, because they were the most suitable for line scales with the pattern at the top plane. Each design is analysed using error graph and E_nscore to determine the most suitable design for 500 mm line scale calibration.

Keywords

line scale; airy point; En score

Full Text:

PDF

References

R. C. Putra, U. K.- Karo, and Purnawan. (2015). Analisis Penilaian Kualitas Dimensi Produk Uji Kompetensi Keahlian Teknik Permesinan di SMK,” J. Mech. Eng. Educ., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 98–105.

D. A. Garvin. (1987). Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality, Harvard Business review, pp. 1–23, Dec-1987.

J. S. Beers and K. B. Lee (1982). “Interferometric measurement of length scales at the National Bureau of Standards,” Precis. Eng., vol. 4, pp. 205–214, 1982.

A. Lassila, E. Ikonen, and K. Riski (1994). “Interferometer for calibration of graduated line scales with a moving CCD camera as line detect,” Appl. Opt., vol. 33, no. 16, pp. 3600–3603

“EURAMET.L-K7 Key Comparison Calibration of line scales,” 2006.

S. Beers, John, “Length scale measurement procedures at the national bureau of standard,” Gaithersburg, 87–3625, 1987.

D. Sawyer, B. Parry, S. Phillips, C. Blackburn, and B. Muralikrishnan, “A model for geometry-dependent errors in length artifacts,” J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., vol. 117, pp. 216–230, 2012.

O. Novyanto and E. Pratiwi, “A preliminary study to evaluate the topography of narrow surface plate,” Instrumentasi, vol. 39, pp. 1–8, 2015.

G. Nijsse, “Linear motion systems; a modular approach for improved straightness performance,” Technische Universiteit Delft, 2001.

“DIN 874-1 Straightedges - Part 1: Steel straight edges - Dimensions and technical delivery conditions,” 2003.

A. J. Lewis, “Absolute length measurement using interferometry,” University of London, 2002.

M. G. Cox, “The evaluation of key comparison data : determining the largest concictent subset,” Metrologia, vol. 44, pp. 187–200, 2007.

W. Wöger, “Remarks on the En criterion used in measurement comparisons,” PTB-Mitteilungen, vol. 109, pp. 24–7, 1999.

K. Shirono, M. Shiro, H. Tanaka, and K. Ehara, “Proficiency tests with uncertainty information : Analysis using the maximum likelihood method,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 16–23, 2016.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31153/js.v20i3.717